The time is now. I’ll be rallying up in our state capitol, Albany at 1PM ET on October 21 but there are several rallies going on across the United States and other countries simultaneously.
Our children are not for sale. Join us. Learn more. Also take a listen to my Warriors interview with Seak Smith, General and Founder of the MOM ARMY.
Community creates change. #BeAWarrior
Please watch. Be aware. Learn more. Let us push Congress to designate the cartels “terrorist organizations” immediately. #BeAWarrior #Border911
Watch Videos: jaesonjones.com
Check out our Merch: jaesonjones.com/shop/ #usmexicoborder#southernborder #cartel #mexicoborder #usa #usnews #borderpatrol #border911
A Los Angeles judge has declined to dismiss a series of blockbuster lawsuits against Meta, TikTok, Snap and Google arguing their platforms are intentionally designed to addict and fuel mental health disorders in teenagers, increasing the likelihood they will have to potentially face or settle for billions of dollars the product liability claims.
In the first order advancing litigation raising a novel public nuisance theory from hundreds of government officials and parents of minors, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl on Friday found that the companies can’t wield Section 230 — Big Tech’s favorite legal shield — to escape some claims in the case. She nodded to “the fact that the design features of the platforms — and not the specific content viewed” by users caused their injuries.
Thousands of plaintiffs across the country have sued social media companies, arguing their platforms are essentially defective products that lead to eating disorders, anxiety and suicide, among other mental health injuries. The lawsuits could lead to multibillion-dollar payouts, with similar public nuisance lawsuits from government officials in lawsuits against opioid and tobacco manufacturers having resulted in massive settlements. By steering clear of claims centering on the specific content that companies host, they’re trying to sidestep potential immunity flowing from Section 230, which has historically afforded tech firms significant legal protection from liability as third-party publishers.
On any given day, 2300 American children are missing.
Where are they? No one seems to have answers. Runaways, labor or sex trafficked minors. We know one thing. Studies show that within 48 hours, vulnerable children will be exploited.
Community creates change. It’s 2023. We must all come together and keep an eye out, report and take action if we know of or see anything. We must protect all children.
Please learn more from the National Center of Missing and Exploited Children.
Smartphones have become a constant companion in our teens’ lives. From connection with family and friends to entertainment and literal white noise, young people rely on their smartphones for different types of support, relaxation, and distraction—at home and at school, and during the day and night.
This new report fills a gap in understanding around how teens actually use their smartphones, combining data from kids’ own phones with feedback from our Youth Advisory Council. Teens told us that the draw of their smartphone is both complicated and powerful. They’re managing a barrage of notifications from the apps on their phones—buzzing almost constantly. Phone use in school is common, but policies are inconsistent. Smartphones both help and hurt their sleep, and apps like TikTok provide easy, effortless access to personalized content that provides both relaxation and distraction.
The good news is that many young people have grown savvier about how their phones try to draw them in, and they’re taking steps to protect their digital well-being. But the business model of these apps and devices depends on users picking up their phones and engaging with them as much as possible, and it’s clear that young people are struggling to set boundaries. Helping kids develop digital well-being requires support from parents, educators, and the tech industry itself.
Please tune in today and learn about the upcoming worldwide rally to protect children happening on Saturday, October 29, 2023.
Listen to our interview today. Lynn’s Warriors on TNT Radio. 3-4PM ET #24hournewstalk #BeAWarrior
Social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram have harnessed powerful algorithms to captivate millions of users with endless streams of entertaining videos and content, transforming the way new generations scroll through their screens.
But critics, from policymakers to concerned parents, say those algorithms lead young people down rabbit holes of problematic content, from misinformation and risky social media challenges to dangerous videos about eating disorders and self-harm.
New York State officials on Wednesday unveiled a bill to protect young people from potential mental health risks by prohibiting minors from accessing algorithm-based social media feeds unless they have permission from their parents.
Gov. Kathy Hochul and Letitia James, the state attorney general, announced their support of new legislation to crack down on the often inscrutable algorithms, which they argue are used to keep young users on social media platforms for extended periods of time — sometimes to their detriment.
If the bill is passed and signed into law, anyone under 18 in New York would need parental consent to access those feeds on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, X and other social media platforms that use algorithms to display personalized content. While other states have sought far-reaching bans and measures on social media apps, New York is among a few seeking to target the algorithms more narrowly.
Sign up for the New York Today Newsletter Each morning, get the latest on New York businesses, arts, sports, dining, style and more. Get it sent to your inbox.
The legislation, for example, would target TikTok’s central feature, its ubiquitous “For You” feed, which displays boundless reams of short-form videos based on user interests or past interactions. But it would not affect a minor’s access to the chronological feeds that show posts published by the accounts that a user has decided to follow.
“Our children are in crisis, and it’s up to us to save them,” Ms. Hochul, a Democrat, said during a news conference in Manhattan, using stark terms to compare the addictive effects of social media to underage drinking and smoking.
“Do you understand how an algorithm works?” she asked. “It follows you. It preys on you.”
The bill would also allow parents to limit the number of hours their children can spend on a platform and block their child’s access to social media apps overnight, from midnight until 6 a.m., as well as pause notifications during that time.
Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, said that algorithms allow teens to find like-minded interests and communities, and that it uses them to quickly identify and remove harmful content from its platforms. Both Meta and TikTok also pointed to a range of tools the companies have implemented to give parents increased control and limit the types of content teens can see.
“We want young people to have safe, positive experiences across the internet,” Antigone Davis, the head of global safety at Meta, said in a statement.
Tech:NYC, which represents more than 800 tech companies, raised objections to the proposed legislation, suggesting it could infringe on free speech. It also raised logistical and privacy concerns with verifying the identities and age of users, which it said could require sharing government documents.
Policies to curb the effect of social media on youth mental health have attracted bipartisan support. President Biden in his State of the Union this year called on Congress to ban targeted advertising online for children. In May, the surgeon general warned against the detrimental effect that intensive social media usage can have on anxiety and depression among adolescents.
Earlier this year, Montana enacted an outright ban on TikTok, resulting in a lawsuit being financed by the social media giant that has held up enforcement of the law.
In March, Utah became the first state to pass a law, set to take effect next year, that will require users under 18 to receive consent of a parent or guardian to create a social media account; Arkansas would have become the first state to implement such a law in August, but it was temporarily blocked by a federal judge.
And following a landmark law in the European Union last year, users there are allowed to easily opt out of so-called personalized content feeds.
The bill in New York, which could be considered as soon as January when the 2024 legislative session begins, is likely to confront resistance from tech industry groups. The bill’s sponsors, State Senator Andrew Gounardes and Assemblywoman Nily Rozic, said they were readying for a fight.
But Ms. Hochul’s enthusiastic support of the bill — she rarely joins lawmakers to introduce bills — is a sign that it could succeed in the State Capitol, which Democrats control.
A second bill unveiled on Wednesday is meant to protect children’s privacy by prohibiting websites from “collecting, using, sharing, or selling personal data” from anyone under 18 for the purpose of advertising, unless they receive consent, according to a news release.
“Social media platforms manipulate the content children see online to keep them on the platforms as long as possible,” Ms. James said. “They know that the more time children spend online, the more ads they will see and the more data that can be collected to sell to advertisers.”
Both bills would empower the state attorney general to go after platforms found in violation.
Common Sense Media released a new research report revealing that teens are constantly receiving and fielding notifications on their smartphones. According to the report, “Constant Companion: A Week in the Life of a Young Person’s Smartphone Use,” over half of participants received 237 or more notifications per day. The barrage of notifications, along with smartphone use during school days and nighttime, combines to create a powerful yet complicated relationship between teens and their phones.
The new report fills a gap in understanding around how teens actually use their smartphones, combining data voluntarily collected from kids’ own phones with feedback about the data collected from Common Sense Media’s Youth Advisory Council. The conversations provide insights into the push and pull that adolescents feel with their phones, including the apps they love, the pressure they feel to respond, and the strategies they use to balance their smartphone use. For example, while TikTok was one of the most popular and longest-duration apps for teens in the study, a Youth Council member said that “the algorithm for TikTok is just way more addicting … it draws you in more.”
“This report makes it abundantly clear that teens are struggling to manage their phone use, which is taking a serious toll on their ability to focus and overall mental health,” said James P. Steyer, founder and CEO of Common Sense Media. “Young people need more support from family members and educators, as well as clear guardrails from the technologists who are intentionally designing these devices to be addictive, at the expense of kids’ well-being.”
We should do the same in America.
Several Israeli and Jewish schools are reportedly urging parents to delete social media apps like Instagram, TikTok and X, formerly known as Twitter, from their children’s smartphones to prevent them from seeing violent images and videos related to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
One Tel Aviv school’s parents’ association warned of the possibility that Hamas fighters may release graphic videos of hostages “begging for their lives,” CNN reported on Tuesday.
Several Jewish schools in the U.S. have also issued similar warnings, reported the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, which added that “It was not clear where the information about forthcoming hostage videos was coming from.”
